Tag Archives: technorati

Justice Department Failed to Treat Identity Theft as one of the Nation’s Fastest Growing Crimes

By: Charles Bell
March 31, 2010

The Justice Department made the same mistake you might!

It appears that the Justice Department failed to treat identity theft  as priority and one of the nation’s fastest growing crimes in America.

It’s no wonder why millions of American’s take identity theft so lightly. People get protected!
Protect you and your family. I personally believe that Pre-Paid Legal’s Identity Theft Shield
is the best Protection and Restoration product… but even if you don’t like our product
do something to protect yourself!

The Justice department failed to make a coordinated effort to fight identity theft and in fact reduced efforts as it’s priority faded.

In a report from Inspector General Glenn Fine, Identity theft affects an estimated 10 million Americans annually. Victims suffer financial losses and tremendous inconvenience in trying to repair damage to their names or credit histories. This is where our product is different from others on the market. Research Kroll and you’ll know you’re working with the best company for ID Theft Protection and RESTORATION.

The report comes on the heals of a sentencing in Boston of one of the world’s most notorious computer hackers, who got 20 years in prison for helping run a global ring that stole tens of millions of payment card numbers.

Albert Gonzalez, a 28-year-old college dropout from Miami, had pleaded guilty to helping lead a ring that stole more than 40 million payment card numbers by breaking into retailers, including TJX Cos Inc, BJ’s Wholesale Club Inc and Barnes & Noble. Do you shop? Are you protected? Your data is out there! Protect yourself!!!

According to the inspector general’s audit the Justice Department did not have internal strategies to fight identity theft and has not appointed anyone to to coordinate the efforts needed to fight ID Theft.

Overall the report stated that the department needs more leadership to fix it’s deficiencies on identity theft.

The same is true for you if you haven’t protected yourself and your family. Please don’t wait to become another statistic.

We are here to help!

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

LifeLock Identity Theft Company pays $11 million to Federal Trade Commission (FTC)

For Release: 03/09/2010

LifeLock Will Pay $12 Million to Settle Charges by the FTC and 35 States That Identity Theft Prevention and Data Security Claims Were False.

LifeLock, Inc. has agreed to pay $11 million to the Federal Trade Commission and $1 million to a group of 35 state attorneys general to settle charges that the company used false claims to promote its identity theft protection services, which it widely advertised by displaying the CEO’s Social Security number on the side of a truck.

In one of the largest FTC-state coordinated settlements on record, LifeLock and its principals will be barred from making deceptive claims and required to take more stringent measures to safeguard the personal information they collect from customers.

“While LifeLock promised consumers complete protection against all types of identity theft, in truth, the protection it actually provided left enough holes that you could drive a truck through it,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz.

“This agreement effectively prevents LifeLock from misrepresenting that its services offer absolute prevention against identity theft because there is unfortunately no foolproof way to avoid ID theft,” Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said. “Consumers can take definitive steps to minimize the chances of having their personal information stolen, and this settlement will help them make more informed decisions about whether to enroll in ID theft protection services.”
Since 2006, LifeLock’s ads have claimed that it could prevent identity theft for consumers willing to sign up for its $10-a-month service.

According to the FTC’s complaint, LifeLock has claimed:

“By now you’ve heard about individuals whose identities have been stolen by identity thieves . . . LifeLock protects against this ever happening to you. Guaranteed.”
“Please know that we are the first company to prevent identity theft from occurring.”
“Do you ever worry about identity theft? If so, it’s time you got to know LifeLock. We work to stop identity theft before it happens.”
The FTC’s complaint charged that the fraud alerts that LifeLock placed on customers’ credit files protected only against certain forms of identity theft and gave them no protection against the misuse of existing accounts, the most common type of identity theft. It also allegedly provided no protection against medical identity theft or employment identity theft, in which thieves use personal information to get medical care or apply for jobs. And even for types of identity theft for which fraud alerts are most effective, they do not provide absolute protection. They alert creditors opening new accounts to take reasonable measures to verify that the individual applying for credit actually is who he or she claims to be, but in some instances, identity thieves can thwart even reasonable precautions.

New account fraud, the type of identity theft for which fraud alerts are most effective, comprised only 17 percent of identity theft incidents, according to an FTC survey released in 2007.

The FTC’s complaint further alleged that LifeLock also claimed that it would prevent unauthorized changes to customers’ address information, that it constantly monitored activity on customer credit reports, and that it would ensure that a customer always would receive a telephone call from a potential creditor before a new account was opened. The FTC charged that those claims were false.

In addition to its deceptive identity theft protection claims, LifeLock allegedly made claims about its own data security that were not true. According to the FTC, LifeLock routinely collected sensitive information from its customers, including their social security numbers and credit card numbers. The company claimed:

“Only authorized employees of LifeLock will have access to the data that you provide to us, and that access is granted only on a ‘need to know’ basis.”
“All stored personal data is electronically encrypted.”
“LifeLock uses highly secure physical, electronic, and managerial procedures to safeguard the confidentiality and security of the data you provide to us.”
The FTC charged that LifeLock’s data was not encrypted, and sensitive consumer information was not shared only on a “need to know” basis. In fact, the agency charged, the company’s data system was vulnerable and could have been exploited by those seeking access to customer information.

The FTC and state settlements with LifeLock bar deceptive claims, and prohibit the company from misrepresenting the “means, methods, procedures, effects, effectiveness, coverage, or scope of any identity theft protection service.” They also bar misrepresentations about the risk of identity theft, and the manner and extent to which LifeLock protects consumers’ personal information. In addition, the settlements require LifeLock to establish a comprehensive data security program and obtain biennial independent third-party assessments of that program for twenty years.

The Attorneys General of Alaska, Arizona, California, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and West Virginia participated in this settlement.

In addition to LifeLock, the FTC complaint named co-founders Richard Todd Davis and Robert J. Maynard, Jr., who will be barred from the same misrepresentations as LifeLock.

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint and the settlement with LifeLock and Richard Todd Davis was 4-0. The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the settlement with Robert J. Maynard, Jr. was 3-1, with Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch dissenting. The documents were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.

The FTC will use the $11 million it receives from the settlements to provide refunds to consumers. It will be sending letters to the current and former customers of LifeLock who may be eligible for refunds under the settlement, along with instructions for applying. Customers do not have to contact the FTC to be eligible for refunds. Up-to-date information about the redress program can be found at 202-326-3757 and at www.ftc.gov/lifelock.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law. Stipulated judgements are for settlement purposes only and do not constitute an admission by the defendant of a law violation. Consent judgments have the force of law when signed by the judge.

In addition to announcing the LifeLock case, the FTC’s Northeast Regional Office sponsored an event to kick off National Consumer Protection week. The goal was to alert consumers to the top complaint categories in the Northeast Region and to arm consumers with the tools to recognize and protect themselves against all types of fraud. Also participating were the Better Business Bureau serving Metropolitan New York, the New York Attorney General’s Office, the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, and AARP.

The Federal Trade Commission works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices and to provide information to help spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish, click http://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov or call 1-877-382-4357. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to more than 1,700 civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad. For free information on a variety of consumer topics, click http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/consumer.shtm.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Claudia Bourne Farrell
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2181
STAFF CONTACT:
Maneesha Mithal or David Lincicum
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-2771 or 202-326 2773
(FTC File No. 072-3069)
(Lifelock)

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Pre-Paid Legal Services Advanced Product Training

    Press Release:

Pre-Paid Legal Services Launches Seventh Year of Advanced Product Training

Quarterly Training Program Offers Associates Road Map to Success

ADA, Okla., Feb. 26 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — On Saturday, Feb. 27, Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. (NYSE: PPD) will complete the first quarter 2010 program of Advanced Product Training (APT), an initiative designed to help PPL associates (the external sales organization) succeed in marketing PPL’s legal service product offerings to individuals, employee groups and small business owners throughout the U.S. and four provinces of Canada.

Since its launch in February 2004, more than 144,000 attendees have participated in APT events which are now held in more than 60 U.S. and Canadian markets served by PPL. On average, the quarterly events draw an estimated 6,000 attendees from among the base of independent PPL associates.

The four-hour program — the first in a series of in-service training and educational programs offered by PPL — includes detailed summaries on the company, its products and services, the member base and the independent provider law firm network. Of equal importance, the APT offers associates keys to success in building a successful business and in sustaining quality member relations. Each local market APT event is conducted by a PPL-qualified trainer and on average the trainers have nine years of experience with the company. Most APT events also include a presentation by an attorney from one of the 40 independent provider law firms that provide legal services to PPL members (customers).

“Advanced Product Training provides a concrete foundation for the success of Pre-Paid Legal Services associates,” said Keith Davis, PPL’s manager of Group Marketing and the coordinator for the APT events. “Based on internal research, we have found that associates who participate in the APT out perform non-participating associates by a considerable margin. In the month following an APT event, participating associates outsell non-participating associates in new memberships by a margin of 14 to one and recruit more new associates by a margin of six to one,” Davis said.

Through February 20, 2010, 50 separate first quarter 2010 APT events have been conducted and the remaining 15 events will be held on Saturday, February 27 at various U.S. and Canadian locations such as, Florida; Hillside, Illinois; Baton Rouge, Louisiana; Phoenix, Arizona; and Toronto, Ontario.

Other quarterly APT events for 2010 are scheduled for May 15, August 21 and November 13. The fee for the APT is $20.

About PPL — We believe our products are one of a kind, life events legal service plans. Our plans provide for legal service benefits provided through a network of independent law firms across the U.S. and Canada, and include unlimited attorney consultation as well as will preparation, traffic violation defense, automobile-related criminal charges defense, letter writing, document preparation and review and a general trial defense benefit. We have an identity theft restoration product we think is also one of a kind because of the combination of outside vendors and our provider law firms. More information about us and our products can be found at our homepage at http://www.prepaidlegal.com.

Forward-Looking Statements — Statements in this press release, other than purely historical information, regarding our future plans and objectives and expected operating results, dividends and share repurchases and statements of the assumptions underlying such statements, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The forward-looking statements contained herein are based on certain assumptions that may not be correct. They are subject to risks and uncertainties incident to our business that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties are described in the reports and statements filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including (among others) those listed in our Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, and include the risks that our membership persistency or renewal rates may decline, that we may not be able to continue to grow our memberships and earnings, that we are dependent on the continued active participation of our principal executive officer, that pending or future litigation may have a material adverse effect on us if resolved unfavorably to us, that we may have compromises of our information security, that consumer purchases of discretionary items may be impacted by a downturn in the economy, that we could be adversely affected by regulatory developments, that competition could adversely affect us, that we are substantially dependent on our marketing force, that our stock price may be affected by short sellers, that we have been unable to increase our employee group membership sales, that our active premium in force is not indicative of future revenue as a result of changes in active memberships from cancellations and additional membership sales and that we have repurchased more than half of our outstanding shares. Please refer to pages 16 through 19 of our 2009 Form 10-K for a more complete description of these risks. We undertake no duty to update any of the forward looking statements in this release.

CONTACT:
George Snyder of Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc.,
1-580-421-6339, cell, 1-580-310-4067
georgesnyder@pplsi.com

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Largest White Collar Crime in America – Identity Theft Are You Protected?


Are you protected
by the Largest White Collar Crime in American history? 1 in every 6 American’s will be affected. What can you do to protect yourself and your family from the identity thieves who right now are looking for their next victim.

Look I don’t want you to believe me... I actually want you to take it upon yourself to learn more about identity theft and how you’re at risk and what you can do about it. Here is a link to the Federal Trade Commission, this site is dedicated solely to fight back against identity theft and educating the public on the problem that is only going to get worse.. here’s the link: www.ftc.gov/idtheft

After you’ve checked-out the link above then view our video below and see what you can do to protect you and your family. Oh and when I mention family I’m also talking about your children. Right now ID Thieves are stealing minors identities because they are not detected as quickly.

By the way… Are you saying to yourself “I have Bad Credit Already they can’t make it Worse”…. What about your Criminal Record? Your Medical Record? Your Employment Record… these identities can also be stolen. Do your research!


Pre-Paid Legal & Identity Theft Protection PlansThese bloopers are hilarious

CLICK HERE To Get Started and to Protect You and Your Family Today!

For more details complete the form below:

[quick_contact]

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Employee Benefits Specialist

Insurance Agents in the US and Canada now have a tremendous opportunity to help their clients and to increase their income.

Insurance professionals are needed to open untapped markets with our cutting-edge voluntary employee benefit Pre-Paid Legal & Identity Theft benefits.

General Agents, Group Specialists and Independent Insurance Agents are able to generate high commissions marketing our Pre-paid Legal Memberships.

Insurance Sales Managers are needed to build team through-out the US and Canada.

  • Everyone needs what we have.
  • It’s affordable.
  • They need it now.
  • And they can only get it from you.

Most insurance products you buy and hope you never use, but when you use them you’re glad you have them.

Most insurance products are good to have but they are not a now benefit.
In a bad economy people cut out things that they are not using “now”.

You can use our products immediately!

The economy makes our products hard for people to live without… because they can use them NOW!

The employee and the employers benefit from our products now.
It doesn’t cost the employer a dime… but it benefits them right now!

To find our more about our Now Benefits and our career opportunities visit:
http://www.lifeeventsins.com

Become a Now Benefit Specialist Today!

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Think and Grow Rich – Three Feet From Gold

By: Charles Bell

I am currently reading Think and Grow Rich – Three Feet From Gold by Author Greg S. Reid which is the sequel to the world famous Think and Grow Rich which sold over 100 million copies.

I’m really enjoying this book and I would highly recommend it.


Star Alerts- Greg S. Reid Author of Three Feet From GoldAwesome video clips here


Greg S. Reid Talking About Three Feet From GoldClick here for more free videos

Whoever, you are wherever you are never give up, never quit! Persist until you succeed.


Three Feet Away, Three Feet From Gold, Bob ProctorThese bloopers are hilarious

We are looking for like minded people who want to succeed in life, who wanted to grow personally and who want to help others grow and prosper. If that’s you, we’d love to hear from you.

May God be with you on your journey, enjoy the ride.

Tagged , , , , ,

Medical Identity Theft on the Rise

Medical Identity Theft

Medical identity theft occurs when someone uses your personal information without your knowledge or consent to obtain, or receive payment for, medical treatment, services, or goods. Victims of medical identity theft may find that their medical records are inaccurate, which can have a serious impact on their ability to obtain proper medical care and insurance benefits.

Medical identity theft is becoming one of the biggest dangers that most people are
totally unaware of.

There are several different forms of Medical identity theft. Identity thieves may obtain names, and social security numbers of victims that have used their information to receive emergency medical care. Stolen medical insurance information, includes member ID’s and policy numbers that are used by these id thieves. Another way that id’s can be stolen and maybe even the most alarming, is medical office employees stealing personal data from patients by way of the office computers and then sell the information to people on the black market. There’s one notorious case were a clerk at a Florida clinic made over 2 million dollars stealing the records of 1,000′s of different Medical patients.

Some critics point to a lack of sufficient electronic safeguards which is one of the main causes and an ever increasing type of medical-related identity theft.

President Obama has a plan to electronically store everyone’s health care records over the next few years. Most of these records will be shipped overseas to have this work done. The systems is going to need a complete overhaul in order to prevent future problems.

The question is; “Do you really trust outside sources to protect your identity”? I don’t know about you but I don’t. That’s why I have and promote Pre-Paid Legal’s Identity Theft Shield. Unlike LifeLock™, PPL – Identity Theft Shield will actually restore your identity if you give them the POA to do so.

The following safeguards are recommended for any medical beneficiaries to protect their medial ID’s.

To detect medical identity theft, consider the following steps:

• Closely monitor any “Explanation of Benefits” sent by public or private health insurers. If anything appears wrong, raise questions with the insurer or the provider. Do not assume that there are no problems simply because you may not owe any money.
• Once a year (or more often, if you believe there is cause for concern), request a listing of benefits paid in your name by any health insurers that might have made such payments on your behalf.
• Monitor your credit reports with the nationwide credit reporting companies – Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion – to identify reports of medical debts.
You also have rights under federal law that can assist you in correcting inaccurate medical records.

These rights are described in greater detail at http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa.
They include:

• The right to request copies of your current medical files from each health care provider.

• The right to have your medical records amended to remove inaccurate or incomplete information.

• The right to an accounting of disclosures – a record of who has been given access to your medical records – from your health care providers and health insurers. This is very important in tracking down where inaccurate information may have been sent.

• The right to file a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights at the federal Department of Health and Human Services if a health care provider does not comply with these rights. In addition, many hospitals have ombudsmen or patient advocates who may be able to help you obtain medical records or provide access to information.

Please be aware that there may be fees for copying and postage if you request copies of your medical records.
Please see http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/hipaa for more information.

Click Here To Protect You Identity Today!

Tagged , , , , , ,

Top Five Most Ridiculous Lawsuits

Here’s living proof that lawsuits are out of control.

In the Press Release below ILR has announced the top five vote getters of its 1st Annual Most Ridiculous Lawsuit of the Year Poll.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – December 30, 2009 
Contact: Mark Szymanski 
202-463-5874 

Top Five Most Ridiculous Lawsuits of 2009 Announced
Voters Give Top ‘Honor’ to Lawsuit Brought by Illegal Immigrants Who Sued Rancher for Turning Them Over to U.S. Border Patrol 

WASHINGTON, D.C.—The U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR) announced today the top five vote getters of its 1st Annual Most Ridiculous Lawsuit of the Year Poll. Nominees were drawn from the monthly Most Ridiculous Lawsuit poll winners, chosen by visitors to FacesofLawsuitAbuse.org, a public awareness campaign Web site that aims to show how abusive lawsuits affect small businesses and average families in very real ways. “

While ridiculous lawsuits may be easy fodder for late-night television hosts, they are no laughing matter for the defendants targeted,” said ILR President Lisa Rickard.

The top five Most Ridiculous Lawsuits of 2009 are: 

5. Neighbor sues woman for smoking in her own home;

4. Double-murderer sues to claim his victims’ classic Chevy pickup; 

3. Holocaust denier sues Auschwitz survivor, alleging memoir contains “fantastical tales;” 

2. Tourist sues hotel, claiming swimming pool got daughter pregnant; 

1. Illegal immigrants sue rancher who stopped them on his property at gunpoint and turned them over to the Border Patrol. 

Links to the news stories about these lawsuits can be found at: http://facesoflawsuitabuse.org/polls-archive/

Throughout the year, the monthly and annual polls collectively received more than 50,000 votes.

ILR seeks to promote civil justice reform through legislative, political, judicial, and educational activities at the national, state, and local levels. 

The U.S. Chamber is the world’s largest business federation representing more than 3 million businesses and organizations of every size, sector, and region.

    Caution this video contains anger and foul language.


Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

A True Story of Identity Theft: Michelle Brown’s Terrifying Experience

[caption id="attachment_259" align="alignleft" width="300" caption="Identity Theft: The Michelle Brown Story"]Id theft is Real and It could happen to you![/caption]

In the time it takes you to read this post, someone could steal your life.

Well, that’s exactly what happens to Michelle Brown. When her personal information is stolen and falls into the wrong hands, Michelle discovers that someone else has taken over her identity and is wreaking total havoc in her world. This is an eye-opening true story they even made a movie about it; Identity Theft: The Michelle Brown Story. We watched it tonight on LMN.tv

Check out this true story on how Identity Theft ruined her life (and all the more terrifying because of it!). It really brings home how terrible this crime can be upon innocent victims.

Based on a true story of Michelle Brown whose identity is stolen by a stranger. Michelle Brown goes into an office one day to fill out a simple rental form, then handed it to the receptionist, she never dreamed that her information would fall into the wrong hands. As Michelle keeps receiving hefty bills for services and merchandise she never purchased, it doesn’t take her long to figure out that someone has stolen her identity, and is determined to take over her life, no matter the cost. But when a warrant is issued for the arrest of the impostor, the real Michelle is wrongly accused. With her life escalating out of control, Michelle must regain her own self to confront her nemesis, and appeal to the U.S. Senate for more concise identity theft laws.

Can you imagine how terrifying this must have been for her? I know if it were me I’d been freaked out. I mean getting arrested for something I had nothing to do with and then have to prove it really wasn’t me is scary.

    Verbal Testimony by Michelle Brown:

U.S. Senate Committee Hearing on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Technology, Terrorism and Goverment Information — “Identity Theft: How to Protect and Restore Your Good Name”
July 12, 2000

Senator Jon Kyl, Chairman
Senator Dianne Feinstein

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee,

I am pleased to be in your presence today and I genuinely thank you for the opportunity to elevate the invasive crime known as identity theft. This is a topic that I am unfortunately, intimately familiar with.

My name is Michelle Brown. I am 29 years old and have been working in the disciplined field of international banking for the last 7 years. I am an ambitious and hard-working individual; I’m certain that I am much like any of your cousins, your nieces, your daughters. I believe that I strongly represent any average, respectable citizen of the United States. However, there is one clear-cut issue that separates me from nearly the rest of the population: I have lived and breathed the nightmare of identity theft. I will tell you first-hand, this is a devastation beyond any outsiders’ comprehension, a nearly unbearable burden that no one should ever have to suffer.

Imagine establishing credit at age 17, and building a perfect credit profile over the next 11 years. Imagine working consistently since age 15, helping to finance your education at an accredited University to advance your future success in life. Imagine never having been in trouble with the law. Imagine the violation you would internalize as you realize some vile individual you have never met nor wronged, has taken everything you have built-up from scratch to grossly use and abuse your good name and unblemished credit profile.

That’s precisely what happened to me. I discovered this new blackened reality on January 12, 1999, when a Bank of America representative called me inquiring about the first payment on a brand new truck, which had been purchased just the previous month. I immediately placed fraud alerts on my credit reports, cancelled all credit cards, and even placed a fraud alert on my Driver’s License number. From that day forward, I unearthed the trail of this menace’s impersonation and attempted to work with the current faulty system to protect myself from any further abuse. The system clearly failed me.

To summarize, over a year and a half from January 1998 through July 1999, one individual impersonated me to procure over $50,000 in goods and services. Not only did she damage my credit, but she escalated her crimes to a level that I never truly expected: she engaged in drug trafficking. The crime resulted in my erroneous arrest record, a warrant out for my arrest, and eventually, a prison record when she was booked under my name as an inmate in the Chicago Federal Prison.

The impersonation began with the perpetrator’s theft of my rental application from my landlord’s property management office in January 1998. Immediately, the perpetrator set up cellular service, followed by residential telephone and other utility services, attempted to obtain timeshare financing and department store credit cards, purchased a $32,000 truck, had nearly $5,000 worth of liposuction performed to her body, and even rented properties in my name including signing a year lease. Not only did this person defraud the Department of Motor Vehicles in obtaining a duplicate drivers’ license (with my name and number) in October 1998, but she even presented herself as me with this identification to the DEA and before a federal judge when she was caught trafficking 3,000 pounds of marijuana in May 1999.

She remained a fugitive for almost 6 months while still assuming my name– and was finally turned in by an acquaintance in July 1999.

Months later – in September 1999 – I was stopped at LAX’s Customs after returning from a vacation in Mexico (after she was already in prison). While I explained my innocence to several agents in a stream of tears, and as I attempted to clearly distinguish this Michelle Brown from the “other Michelle Brown” with a criminal record, I was blatantly treated with strong suspicion. I was, as is typical for an identity fraud victim, guilty until proven innocent. I was finally let go after an hour, after the police were called to vouch for me. This situation reinforced my fear that I may be wrongly identified as the criminal, which could end up with my arrest, or worse yet, being taken into custody to serve time in jail. After having seen so many inefficiencies and blatant errors in the system, I feel no assurance nor can I receive any concrete evidence from authorities that this type of insane mix-up would never happen again.

It was tormenting to know someone was in essence living the good life at my expense, and I was left in the dust with the taxing chore of proving my innocence. The restoration of my credit and my good name was a seemingly never-ending process. I was forced to make literally thousands of phone calls, fill out various forms, submit all sorts of documents, and have many documents notarized. Without a doubt, I was entirely consumed with the whole painstaking process. I gained nothing from putting over 500 hours into the chore of restoration; all in all, it was an exhausting waste of a good person’s time and a massive drain on my life and energy. At one point, I even feared my safety after I learned that the perpetrator had previously been linked with a convicted murderer. The whole identity fraud experience was, by far, the darkest, most challenging and terrifying chapter of my life.

I faced many difficulties in clearing my name, and I still face the fear that I will forever be linked with the perpetrator’s criminal record. I have encountered widespread inefficiency and general insensitivity at nearly every turn, and know that there are most definitely not enough dedicated resources and governmental authorities to assist victims and to simplify the burden on the innocent’s life.

Clearly changes need to be made. The Government not only needs to promote initiatives to shorten and simplify restoration of one’s name and credit, but also to facilitate early detection and termination of an abused name, and most importantly, to deter criminals from the lure of such an easy crime by enforcing swift and severe punishment.

I think that Senator Feinstein’s Identity Theft Prevention Act of 2000 is definitely a positive initiative and will put the legislation in the right direction to fight this crime. I support the two corresponding bills and recommend the enforcement of such initiatives.

I came here today because I feel responsible to limit the abuse of other innocent’s names and their lives. I know how terribly tormenting it is to be a victim. I am living proof that identity theft is a very real crime, with very real victims, and true life-altering consequences. It’s astounding that my life-long discipline to be a law abiding citizen, and to have the diligence to establish perfect credit, was reversed so easily, so quickly, simply because I represent the perfect victim in a criminal’s eyes. This crime is clearly on the rise, and no one at this time is completely protected from becoming the next victim.

I realize the scenario of becoming an identity fraud victim seems entirely far-fetched and implausible to many of you. I know the feeling. I was once in your shoes.

I thank you for your time and for the opportunity to present my story and views today. I hope it is clear now that many changes need to effected to the current system to combat this crime and protect victims. This fact is crystal clear in my mind.

Thank you.

Michelle Brown

Source: http://www.privacyrights.org/cases/victim9.htm

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Protecting Your Childs Privacy

Protect your childs identityWhether to study or socialize, play games or learn something new, it’s likely your kids are spending time online. And as a parent, chances are that you’re spending time thinking about ways to make sure they make smart and safe choices when they do. Among the many choices they’re faced with online is how to deal with their personal information.

The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act – COPPA – gives parents control over what information websites can collect from their kids. Any website for kids under 13, or any general site that collects personal information from kids it knows are under 13, is required to comply with COPPA. The Federal Trade Commission, the nation’s consumer protection agency, enforces this law.

Thanks to COPPA, sites have to get a parent’s permission if they want to collect or share your kids’ personal information, with only a few exceptions. That goes for information sites ask for up-front, and information your kids choose to post about themselves. Personal information includes your child’s full name, address, email address, or cell phone number.

Under COPPA, sites also have to post privacy policies that give details about what kind of information they collect from kids — and what they might do with it (say, to send a weekly newsletter, direct advertising to them, or give the information to other companies). If a site plans to share the child’s information with another company, the privacy policy must say what that company will do with it. Links to the policies should be in places where they’re easy to spot.

What Can You Do?
Your kids’ personal information and privacy are valuable — to you, to them, and to marketers. Here’s how to help protect your kids’ personal information when they’re online.

Check out sites your kids visit. If a site requires users to register, see what kind of information it asks for and whether you’re comfortable with what they tell you. If the site allows kids to post information about themselves, talk to your child about the risks and benefits of disclosing certain information in a public forum. You also can see whether the site appears to be following the most basic COPPA requirements, like clearly posting its privacy policy for parents and asking for parental consent before kids can participate.

Take a look at the privacy policy. Just because a site has a privacy policy doesn’t mean it keeps personal information private. The policy should tell you what the site does with the information it collects; then, you can decide how you feel about it. Remember, if the policy says there are no limits to what it collects or who gets to see it, there are no limits.

Ask questions. If you’re not clear on a site’s practices or policies, ask about them. If the site falls under COPPA, the privacy policy has to include contact information for the site manager.

Be selective with your permission. In many cases, websites need your okay before they’re allowed to collect personal information from your kids. They may ask for your permission in a number of ways, including by email or postal mail. Or, you may give your consent by allowing them to charge your credit card. In addition to considering when to give your permission, consider how much consent you want to give — in many cases, it’s not all or none. You might be able to give the company permission to collect some personal information from your child, but say no to having that information passed along to another marketer.

Know your rights.

    As a parent, you have the right to have a site delete any personal information it has about your child. Some sites will let you see the information they’ve collected. But first, they’ll need to make sure you really are the parent, either by requiring a signed form or an email with a digital signature, for example, or by verifying a charge made to your credit card. You also have a right to take back your consent and have any information collected from your child deleted.

    Report a website. If you think a site has collected or disclosed information from your kids or marketed to them in a way that violates the law, report it to the FTC at ftc.gov/complaint or 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357).

    More Tips For Parents
    Talk, and talk often. Make sure your kids know what information should be private, and what information might be appropriate for sharing. When they give out their personal information, they give up control of who can reach them, whether it’s with a marketing message or something more personal. On the other hand, sharing some personal information may allow them to participate in certain activities or to get emails about promotions and events they’re interested in.

    Depending on what they do online, also remind your kids that once they post information online, they can’t take it back. Even if they delete the information from a site, older versions may exist on other people’s computers and be circulated online.

    Know what sites your kids go to. Talk with your kids about the sites they like to visit. Do some exploring on your own to get to know how the sites work and what privacy settings and controls they offer.

    Make agreements. Be sure your kids know what your family has decided is okay — and not okay — to divulge online. Consider writing down a list of the rules your family has agreed on, and posting them where everyone can see them.

    Let your kids know you’ll keep an eye on the sites they visit. One option is to check your browser history and temporary files, though keep in mind that older kids may know how to delete these files or keep them from getting recorded. If you’d like more controls, check to see what privacy settings your browser offers or consider software that offers a range of controls. Visit the GetNetWise website to learn more.

    Know how your kids get online. Kids may get online using your family computer or someone else’s, as well as through cell phones and game consoles. Know what limits you can place on your child’s cell phone — some companies have plans that limit downloads, Internet access, and texting on cell phones; other plans allow kids to use those features at certain times of day. Check out what parental controls are available on the gaming consoles your kids use, as well.

    For More Information
    The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint or to get free information on consumer issues, visit ftc.gov or call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357); TTY: 1-866-653-4261. The FTC enters consumer complaints into the Consumer Sentinel Network, a secure online database and investigative tool used by hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.

    Visit OnGuardOnline.gov for more tips on securing your computer, protecting personal information whether you’re using a wireless connection or a traditional one, and guarding against Internet fraud. OnGuardOnline.gov is maintained by the Federal Trade Commission, the nation’s consumer protection agency.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,